Appendix 01

Synergies and trade-offs in supporting nutrition through climate-smart agriculture, sustainable healthy diets and reduction of food loss and waste

A1.1 Synergies and trade-offs in climate-smart agricultural strategies

Adopting
climate-smart
agricultural practices
Synergies Trade-offs Supporting actions
to address
trade-offs
Improved seed
or fertiliser
access
●  Close yield gaps, offsetting up to 25% of emissions from agricultural expansion.
●  Reduce vulnerability to climate shocks, limiting price increases and safeguarding food security by retaining food supply.
●  Can increase availability of diverse foods where improved inputs support diversified production, improving dietary quality and micronutrient intake.
●  Higher fertiliser demand may cause price spikes and supply
disruptions.
● Equity risks: benefits may concentrate among well-resourced farmers with access to credit, irrigation and markets, leaving smallholders more vulnerable.
● Increased fertiliser use can increase nitrate contamination of drinking water where runoff is poorly managed, raising health risks in exposed communities.
●  Stabilise supply and prices through public procurement buffers, predictable import rules and targeted transport/storage support.
● Provide input subsidies and credit access for low-income farmers.
●  Promote soil testing and site-specific nutrient management.
invest in extension services.
●  Monitor water quality in agricultural areas (health system role).
Crop rotation ●  Implement natural pest control and biological nitrogen fixation to lower emissions by reducing demand for synthetic fertilisers and pesticides.
●  Diversify on-farm food production, potentially improving household dietary diversity.
●  Reduce vulnerability to climate shocks, limiting price increases and safeguarding food security.
●  Greater knowledge and planning requirements for farmers.
●  Additional operations (multiple planting/harvesting windows) increase labour demands and may reduce off-farm work opportunities.
●  If rotation crops are less preferred or harder to prepare, households may sell them and continue eating staples, limiting dietary diversity gains despite production diversification.
●  Provide extension schools and planning support for farmers for field rotation design and timing.
●  Support labour-saving equipment, shared services or coordinated planting and harvesting to reduce time burdens.
●  Promote locally acceptable, nutrient-dense rotation crops and behaviour change support so production gains translate into dietary improvements.
Livestock
production
efficiency
●  Improve carcass size or milk yield to reduce methane emissions per unit output by decreasing herd size needed.
●  Increase availability of animal-source foods that provide high-quality protein and micronutrients (iron, zinc, vitamin B12).
●  Raise farm incomes when efficiency gains are retained by producers.
●  Lower costs per unit may increase demand and total production, offsetting emissions reductions (rebound effect).
●  Increased feed demand diverts crop land to feed production, exacerbating environmental pressures and reducing land for human food crops.
● Smaller producers may be less competitive and exit markets, concentrating production and increasing rural poverty.
●  Link efficiency support to emissions intensity benchmarks and caps/guardrails on herd expansion to prevent rebound effects.
●  Prioritise crop residues, by-products and forage crops on marginal land for feed rather than dedicating prime crop land.
●  Provide grants and credit to smallholder farmers for improving fodder quality, animal health and housing.
●  Health system role: provide dietary counselling on balanced animal-source food consumption; monitor and treat diet-related non-communicable diseases as consumption patterns shift.
Land-based
practices (minimum
tillage, cover cropping,
agroforestry)
●  Increase soil carbon sequestration and build resilience to erosion and water stress.
●  Improve long-term soil fertility and productivity.
●  Can diversify farm outputs (e.g. fruits, nuts from agroforestry), improving dietary diversity.
●  Lower yields in early years as soils adjust, reducing food availability and farm incomes during transition.
●  High initial labour demands may reduce time for off-farm work or caregiving, affecting household welfare.
●  Provide time-bound transitional payments, concessional credit
and insurance products designed for early-year yield variability.
●  Establish custom-hiring centres for appropriate machinery; provide training on timing and residue management to reduce labour intensity.
● Ensure social protection programmes maintain household food access during the transition period (health system role).
Holistic grazing
or regenerative
agriculture
●  Increase soil carbon stocks through improved pasture management.
●  Build resilience to drought and maintain forage quality under climate stress.
●  Can improve livestock health and productivity.
●  Maintaining stocking rates while improving pasture quality may push expansion into new land or displace environmental pressure elsewhere.
● May reinforce continued livestock expansion and reduce incentives for diversification towards lower-emissions production systems.
●  Rotational grazing requires infrastructure (fencing, water points) and active management; upfront costs can exclude smaller herders.
●  Align grazing support with land use planning and monitor land conversion to prevent expansion-driven emissions.
●  Provide subsidised or collective infrastructure (fencing, shared water points, mobile troughs) and community-managed systems for small herders.
● Set clear limits on herd expansion and link grazing support to diversification and emissions targets.

A1.2 Synergies and trade-offs in sustainable healthy diets

Adopting sustainable
healthy diets
Synergies Trade-offs Supporting actions
to address
trade-offs
Plant-based
diets and health
●  Reduce premature mortality by 20% (10 million deaths prevented) through reduced risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer and type 2 diabetes.
●  Reduce food systems emissions by 50% (flexitarian) to 75% (fully plant based).
●  Reduce health system burden from diet-related non-communicable diseases.
●  Risk of inadequate intake of some micronutrients for specific population groups, if dietary change is poorly designed.
●  Access to diverse nutrient-dense foods remains uneven across settings.
●  Behaviour change may be slow where prices, food environments and social norms favour less healthy diets.
●  Create demand for selected nutrient-dense foods (e.g. increasing consumption of green leafy vegetables) through food-based dietary guidelines and nutrition education.
●  Link dietary transition support with direct health system interventions: micronutrient supplementation, fortification programmes and vitamin A supplementation.
●  Integrate nutrition counselling into antenatal care, child health services and non-communicable disease prevention programmes.
●  Provide behaviour change communication through community health platforms.
●  Use procurement standards and healthcare delivery platforms to provide or prescribe nutritious foods for priority groups.
Making plant-based
diets affordable
and accessible
●  Increased consumption of whole grains, vegetables, fruits, legumes and nuts fosters sustainable production and provides critical health benefits for populations.
● Reduced consumption of sugar, red meat and processed meat reduces mortality and the prevalence of non-communicable diseases.
●  Affordability remains a major barrier: as of 2021, 58% of the global population could not afford a healthy diet, the majority of whom (over 75%) live in Africa.
●  Sustainable healthy diets are 18–29% more expensive than current diets in low-income countries, requiring careful transition planning.
●  Subsidy reform may face political resistance from affected industries.
●  Reduce food loss and waste to lower production costs and food prices.
●  Promote socioeconomic development to raise household purchasing power.
●  Implement full-cost accounting of environmental impacts to adjust relative prices.
●  Integrate nutrition into social protection design; ensure food assistance programmes (school feeding, maternal/child nutrition) provide diverse, nutrient-dense foods, not just staples (health system role).
●  Use taxes on unhealthy foods and sugar-sweetened beverages to help fund subsidies for nutrient-dense, plant-based foods.
Ensuring dietary
transitions support
climate adaptation
and mitigation
●  Reduce demand for emissions-intensive animal-source foods, achieving up to 50% average emissions reductions.
●  Build resilience by diversifying diets and reducing dependence on climate-vulnerable animal-source food systems.
●  National food-based dietary guidelines can guide population-level dietary shifts.
●  Food-based dietary guidelines show modest emissions reduction potential (12% to 13%) when guidance on meat and dairy is not specific.
● Dietary recommendations to increase animal-source foods for specific nutrient needs could increase emissions substantially.
●  Strengthen food-based dietary guidelines with explicit, specific guidance on limiting meat and dairy intake.
●  Implement climate-smart agricultural practices that support production of diverse, nutrient-dense plant foods while reducing emissions.
●  Coordinate food environment policies (labelling, marketing restrictions, retail placement) with dietary guidance.

A1.3 Synergies and trade-off strategies focused on reducing food loss and waste

Reducing food
loss and waste
Synergies Trade-offs Supporting actions
to address
trade-offs
Improvements in
post-harvest storage,
processing and
distribution systems
●  Reduce losses from heat, humidity and pests, which are intensifying within climate change.
●  Stabilise food supply and reduce seasonal price spikes, improving year-round access to nutritious foods.
●  Increased refrigeration and energy-intensive storage systems can raise greenhouse gas emissions, potentially offsetting gains from reduced food loss and waste.
● Infrastructure investments may not be affordable for smallholder farmers and small enterprises.
●  Benefits may accrue for larger operations with capital access widening inequities.
●  Prioritise low-emissions storage technologies: hermetic bags, improved ventilation, solar-powered cooling and climate-controlled silos, rather than energy-intensive refrigeration.
●  Provide subsidised or collective infrastructure for smallholders: state-subsidised food reserves, shared storage facilities.
●  Support portable, scalable technologies appropriate for
small-scale producers.
Trade
expansion
●  Redistribute surplus food from regions with excess to regions facing production shortfalls, improving food access during climate shocks.
●  Diversify supply chains and increase the number of exporting regions, reducing vulnerability to localised climate extremes.
●  Increased emissions from transport if fossil fuel–dependent logistics are used.
●  Over-reliance on imports from a small set of countries heightens risk if climate extremes strike multiple suppliers simultaneously.
● May undermine local food production and farmer livelihoods if not managed carefully.
●  Invest in low-emissions transport infrastructure and logistics systems.
●  Establish diverse trading partnerships to avoid over-reliance on limited suppliers.
●  Harmonise food safety and quality standards to facilitate efficient cross-border distribution.
●  Balance trade expansion with support for local food production and regional food systems.
Improvements in the
food supply chain
●   Reduce waste at stages where products carry the full emissions burden from production through processing.
●   Increase efficiency and lower costs throughout the food system, potentially improving affordability.
●  Economic feedback effects, such as lowered food prices and political and practical barriers. ●  Implement consumer education campaigns, awareness-raising and behavioural nudges to improve household storage and reduce plate waste.
●   Link food loss and waste reduction to food assistance programmes: redirect recovered food through school feeding, emergency food distribution and nutrition programmes.

Share Synergies and trade-offs in supporting nutrition through climate-smart agriculture, sustainable healthy diets and reduction of food loss and waste