NAF Commitment Progress Assessment Methodology
The Global Nutrition Report (GNR) has been synthesising and analysing the best available data on nutrition since its inception in 2014. Originating from the first Nutrition for Growth (N4G) Summit, the GNR continues to supply the evidence required to drive efforts towards eradicating malnutrition in all its forms. It has consistently tracked and monitored progress against commitments made since the London 2013 N4G Summit.
In 2021, the GNR introduced the Nutrition Action Framework (NAF), the world’s first independent and comprehensive platform for registering SMART nutrition commitments and monitoring nutrition action. Since the launch of the NAF, over 300 commitment makers have registered more than 1,500 commitments.
The GNR periodically invites registered commitment makers to submit progress reports on their commitments. To support the reporting of progress on registered commitments, the GNR developed a standardised and comprehensive online form, referred to as the Commitment Progress Tracking survey form. Commitment makers provide information on the indicators used to track progress, when and how often this progress is assessed and any barriers or facilitators to achieving progress on their commitments.
The methodology presented here details the GNR’s approach to assessing those reports of progress on commitments registered in the NAF. This guide first provides an overview of the commitment assessment methodology. It then provides definitions of the assessment outcomes. The guide concludes with comprehensive examples of assessments across various outcomes and types of key indicators for the commitment.
The GNR assesses progress by comparing the reported value or status of the key indicator against the commitment’s baseline and target values established during the commitment-making process.
For commitments with numerical key indicators (i.e. absolute number, currency or percent), progress is evaluated against the expected linear progress from the baseline and target values between the start and end dates. For commitments with non-numerical (i.e. binary) key indicators (e.g. the establishment of a governmental body or the publication of a food composition table), progress is evaluated on whether the target has been achieved at the time of the progress report. See Table 1 for progress assessment statuses and definitions.
During the assessment process, the GNR may contact commitment makers to request additional information or clarifications on the submitted data, seeking response within 7 calendar days of the request being sent to the commitment maker. Before publishing the progress assessment in the NAF Commitment Tracker, the GNR shares the assessed status with the commitment maker, providing an opportunity for an expeditious review (within 7 calendar days of the request being sent to the commitment maker).
Results from the progress assessment are published in the NAF Commitment Tracker once progress reports are processed. Commitment makers may reach out to [email protected] with any questions about this process.
Table 1. Progress assessment statuses and definitions
| Status | Definition: Numerical key indicators | Definition: Non-numerical key indicators |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Reached by End Date | The reported key indicator value is equal to, within 1% or greater than the target value before the commitment end date. | The commitment maker reports the target has been reached before the end date. |
| 2. Reached After End Date | The reported key indicator value is equal to, within 1% or greater than the target value after the commitment end date. | The commitment maker reports the target has been reached after the end date. |
| 3. On Course | The reported key indicator value is equal to, within 1% or greater than the expected value for the period. | N/A |
| 4. Off Course | The reported key indicator value is below the expected value for the period and outside the 1% threshold. | N/A |
| 5. In Progress | N/A | The target has not been reached, and the report is still before the end date. |
| 6. Not Reached | The target value has not been met by the end date. | The end date has passed, and the target is not reported as reached. |
| 7. Withdrawn | The commitment maker has withdrawn their commitment or indicated that they no longer wish to report progress towards their commitment. | The commitment maker has withdrawn their commitment or indicated that they no longer wish to report progress towards their commitment. |
| 8. Superseded | The commitment maker has made a more recent commitment that replaces or modifies a past commitment. | The commitment maker has made a more recent commitment that replaces or modifies a past commitment. |
| 9. No Response | The commitment maker does not report progress towards their commitment during the progress reporting window. | The commitment maker does not report progress towards their commitment during the progress reporting window. |
| 10. Progress Not Able to Be Assessed | Despite the commitment maker’s active participation in the process, they provided no baseline data at registration nor during progress reporting or they reported that the key indicator has not been measured since the commitment was registered or they do not provide the required information about the key indicator’s latest level or status. | Despite the commitment maker’s active participation in the process, they provided no baseline data at registration nor during progress reporting or they reported that the key indicator has not been measured since the commitment was registered or they do not provide the required information about the key indicator’s latest level or status. |
Tables 2–5 provide examples of progress assessment for the following types of key indicators:
- Table 2: Key indicators expressed as absolute numbers, e.g. number of people, number of households, number of products.
- Table 3: Key indicators expressed as currencies, e.g. total USD spent.
- Table 4: Key indicators expressed as percentages, e.g. proportion of people, prevalence in the population, proportion of products.
- Table 5: Key indicators that are non-numerical (i.e. binary), i.e. yes/no.
Please note that the examples below do not include ‘Withdrawn’, ‘Superseded’, ‘No Response’ or ‘Progress Not Able to Be Assessed’ outcomes.
Table 2. Key indicators expressed as absolute numbers
| Outcome | Indicator |
Baseline value |
Target value |
Start date |
End date |
Expected value (assuming linear progress) |
Reported value |
Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reached by End Date | Number of pupils benefiting from school canteens. | (Dec 2020): 97,518 pupils | 300,000 pupils | Jan 2021 | Dec 2030 | Dec 2030: 300,000 pupils | Dec 2030: 310,000 pupils |
Commitment is “reached by end date” since the reported number of pupils benefiting from school canteens at the time of the end of the commitment is greater than the specified target value. |
| Reached After End Date | Number of local government units (LGUs) implementing Multiple Micronutrient Supplementation (MMS) programmes. | (Jan 2021): 30 LGUs | 70 LGUs | Jan 2021 | Jan 2025 | Jan 2025: 70 LGUs | Jun 2026: 70 LGUs |
Commitment is “reached after end date” since the target of 70 LGUs implementing MMS programmes was achieved after the specified end date. |
| On Course* | Number of households with improved access to diverse, nutritious and safe food through nutrition sensitive and climate resilient agriculture programmes of IIRR. | (Jan 2022): 1,745 households | 57,000 households | Jan 2022 | Jan 2027 | Jan 2025: 33,153 households | Jan 2025: 35,000 households | Commitment is "on course" as the number of households with improved access to diverse, nutritious and safe food in 2025 is greater than the expected number of households at the time of the reported progress. |
| Off Course* | Number of micronutrient fortified servings produced. | (Jan 2022): 78,000,000 (78 million) servings | 1,000,000,000 (1 billion) servings | Jan 2022 | Jan 2030 | Jan 2025: 345,750,000 servings | Jan 2025: 80,000,000 (80 million) servings | Commitment is "off course" as the reported number of micronutrient fortified servings produced in 2025 is less than the expected number of servings at the time of the reported progress. |
| Not Reached | Number of micronutrient fortified servings produced. | (Dec 2021): 78,000,000 (78 million) servings | 1,000,000,000 (1 billion) servings | Jan 2022 | Jan 2030 | Jan 2030: 1,000,000,000 (1 billion) servings | Jan 2030: 80,000,000 (80 million) servings | Commitment is "not reached" as the reported number of micronutrient fortified servings produced at the end date of the commitment is less than the target value. |
* Assumed a linear rate of progress; calculated using the average annual change multiplied by the period to date in calendar years or months where applicable.
Table 3. Key indicators that are expressed as currencies
| Outcome | Indicator |
Baseline value |
Target value |
Start date |
End date |
Expected value (assuming linear progress) |
Reported value |
Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reached by End Date | Disbursement to fund nutrition-sensitive programmes (in GMD). | (Dec 2020): GMD 500 million disbursed | GMD 800 million | Jan 2021 | Sep 2030 | Sep 2030: GMD 800 million | Sep 2030: GMD 800 million disbursed | Commitment is “reached by end date” since the disbursement to fund nutrition-sensitive programmes in 2030 is equal to the target. |
| Reached After End Date | Disbursement for nutrition-specific interventions (in AUD). | (Oct 2021): AUD 0 | AUD 500 million | Dec 2021 | Jan 2025 | Jan 2025: AUD 500 million | Dec 2026: AUD 500 million |
Commitment is “reached after end date” since the target of AUD 500 million was achieved after the end date. |
| On Course* | Disbursement to fund R&D programmes to develop more nutrition foods (in USD). | (Jan 2022): USD 8 million | USD 20 million | Oct 2022 | Sep 2025 | Sep 2024: USD 16 million | Sep 2024: USD 17 million | Commitment is "on course" as the disbursement to fund R&D programmes to develop more nutrition foods in 2024 is greater than the expected disbursement at the time of the reported progress. |
| Off Course* | Health expenditure per capita (in USD). | (Dec 2020): USD 20 | USD 70 | Jan 2021 | Dec 2025 | Dec 2023: USD 50 | Dec 2023: USD 42 | Commitment is "off course" as the reported health expenditure per capita in 2023 is less than the expected expenditure at the time of the reported progress. |
| Not Reached | Four-year disbursements for nutrition-related programmes (in EUR). | (Jan 2021): EUR 80 million | EUR 150 million | Jan 2022 | Jan 2025 | Jan 2025: EUR 150 million | Jan 2025: EUR 110 million | Commitment is "not reached" as the four-year disbursements for nutrition-related programmes in Jan 2025 is less than the target value. |
* Assumed a linear rate of progress; calculated using the average annual change multiplied by the period to date in calendar years or months where applicable.
Table 4. Key indicators expressed as percentages
| Outcome | Indicator |
Baseline value |
Target value |
Start date |
End date |
Expected value (assuming linear progress) |
Reported value |
Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reached by End Date | Prevalence (%) of exclusive breastfeeding. | (Dec 2022): 16.2% | 25% | Jan 2022 | Sep 2025 | N/A | Mar 2025: 25% |
Commitment is “reached by end date” since the reported prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding is equal to the specified target before the end date. |
| Reached After End Date | Percentage of children under 5 years of age with severe acute malnutrition treated | (Dec 2021): 30% | 60% | Dec 2021 | Dec 2030 | N/A | Dec 2031: 60% | Commitment is “reached after end date” since the target of treating 60% of children under 5 years with acute malnutrition was achieved after the specified end date. |
| On Course* | Percentage of school-age children who study Food Education in primary schools. | (Dec 2022): 0% | 8% | Dec 2022 | Dec 2030 | Dec 2025: 3% | Dec 2025: 3% |
Commitment is "on course" as the reported percentage of school-age children who studied Food Education in primary schools in 2025 is greater than the expected percentage. |
| Off Course* | Percentage of saturated fat in food products. | (Dec 2022): 10% | 4% | Dec 2022 | Dec 2025 | Dec 2024: 6% | Dec 2024: 8% |
Commitment is "off course" as the reported percentage of saturated fat in food products in 2024 is greater than the expected percentage. |
| Not Reached |
Prevalence (%) of stunted children under 5 years of age. |
(Jan 2020): 17% | 7% | Jan 2020 | Dec 2024 | N/A | Dec 2024: 10% | Commitment is "not reached" as the reported prevalence of stunted children under 5 years of age after the end date of the commitment is greater than the target value. |
* Assumed a linear rate of progress; calculated using the average annual change multiplied by the period to date in calendar years or months where applicable.
Table 5. Key indicators that are non-numerical (binary indicators)
| Outcome | Indicator |
Baseline status |
Target status |
Start date |
End date |
Reported status |
Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reached by End Date | Breast milk substitutes (BMS) code passed as a law and enforced. | (Jan 2022): No (i.e. BMS code is not passed into a law and not enforced). | Yes (i.e. BMS code is signed into law and enforced.) | Jan 2022 | Dec 2024 | 2024: Yes (i.e. BMS code is signed into law and enforced). | Commitment is "reached by end date" as the BMS code passed as a law and enforced before the end of the end date. |
| Reached After End Date | Enhanced multisectoral nutrition information system fully operational. | (Jan 2022): No (i.e. enhanced multisectoral information system is not fully operational). | Yes (i.e. enhanced multisectoral information system is fully operational). | Jan 2022 | Dec 2025 | Apr 2026: Yes (i.e. enhanced multisectoral information system is fully operational). | Commitment is “reached after end date” as the target status was achieved after the commitment end date. |
| In Progress | A food security and nutrition act in place. | (Jan 2021): No (i.e. there is no food security and nutrition act in place). | Yes (i.e. a food security and nutrition act is in place). | Jan 2021 | Dec 2026 | 2024: The status is still “no”, but the act has been drafted. | Commitment is "on course" as the commitment maker noted that an act has been drafted and it is reasonable to expect the act will be in place in 2 years by end date. |
| Not Reached | Establishment of a parliamentary body to address childhood obesity. | (Jan 2022): No (i.e. there is no parliamentary body to address child’s obesity). | Yes (i.e. a parliamentary body to address childhood obesity has been established). | Jan 2022 | Dec 2023 | Jan 2024: No (i.e. the body has not been established yet). | Commitment is "not reached" as the end date of the commitment has passed and the commitment has not reached the target. |
Last updated: 24 March 2026.
NAF Commitment Progress Reporting Assessment Methodology
Jump to section Jump to section