About the Nutrition Accountability Framework

Poor diet and resulting malnutrition, in all its forms, are among the greatest global health and societal challenges of our time.^[1] Before the Covid-19 pandemic, we lost almost 250 million years of life prematurely, every year, worldwide due to child and maternal malnutrition, and almost 170 million years due to dietary risks associated with non-communicable diseases (NCDs).^[2] That is, one in every seven premature deaths was attributable to poor diet, with the majority of that diet-related burden experienced in low- and middle-income countries.^[3]

As a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, malnutrition and related premature deaths were projected to increase.^[4] The impacts of the pandemic exacerbated food insecurity, poor diets and malnutrition globally, threatening a lasting impact on children and adults.^[5] Given the additional impacts of worsening climate change,^[6] the need for more equitable, resilient and sustainable food and health systems has never been more urgent.^[7]

Recognising the need to tackle poor diets and malnutrition, national governments and multilateral organisations endorsed 2021 as the Nutrition Year of Action. In June of that year, the G7 leaders noted that responsible investments in food security, food systems and nutrition are essential to support Sustainable Development Goal 2 (zero hunger) and the World Health Assembly global nutrition targets. The G7 leaders further encouraged strong commitments in these areas to be announced at the G20, the UN Food Systems Summit, UN Climate Change Conference (COP26) and the Tokyo Nutrition for Growth (N4G) Summit in 2021.^[8]

The key nutrition events throughout 2021, and a climate of urgency, presented unprecedented opportunities for actors to make commitments and drive action towards improving nutrition. This was a turning point in driving collaboration to win the fight against poor diets and malnutrition. Stakeholders were asked to collaborate and coordinate efforts for bold and SMART (that is: Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant and Time-bound) nutrition commitments.

To support the shared goal of ending poor diets and malnutrition in all its forms, the joint statement of the Tokyo N4G Summit and the UN Food Systems Summit called for a comprehensive framework for accountability. This framework was established to monitor all nutrition actions according to common principles, methods and approach, and to encourage stronger commitments by monitoring translation into scale and impact.

The community recognised that commitments should be consistently and publicly shared, tracked and consolidated into usable insights to inform and drive better action through decision-making across sectors. As part of this shared goal, the the Global Nutrition Report (GNR) was endorsed by the government of Japan and the N4G Accountability Working Group, as well as the GNR’s Stakeholder Group, to lead and drive forward global accountability for nutrition.

The GNR committed to developing the world’s first independent and comprehensive global accountability framework for nutrition: the Nutrition Accountability Framework (NAF). The NAF aims to drive stronger nutrition action and accelerate progress in tackling poor diets and malnutrition in all its forms across all locations and sectors. Stakeholders are encouraged to use the NAF Platform to register and report on their nutrition commitments.

Since 2014, the GNR has been collecting and analysing comprehensive data on nutrition, and tracking commitments for the 2013, 2017, 2021 and 2025 N4G summits. Those making commitments to help drive faster and fairer progress to tackle poor diets and malnutrition include governments, aid donors, civil society organisations, multilateral organisations, businesses and researchers. The GNR, building on its existing tools and expertise and drawing on elements from other accountability frameworks, ^[9]created an independent and comprehensive global accountability framework to better serve decision-makers and the nutrition community.

The NAF is designed to record all new commitments on nutrition, monitor their impact and set out requirements for SMART commitment formulation. The framework is redefining how nutrition-related commitments should be formulated, registered, qualified, assessed and reported.^[10] It has developed a new architecture to allow nutrition stakeholders and decision-makers across sectors to take meaningful action, track their impact and receive recognition for doing so.

The GNR works together with all those committed to improving nutrition to leverage pre-existing reporting mechanisms, collate the best available data and unify reporting on progress and how that translates into impact. This facilitates reporting on actions taken, identifies gaps in action, and determines the most impactful actions to allow for allocating resources where they are most needed. Past N4G commitments made at the 2013 and 2017 summits were recorded and tracked through the GNR N4G Commitment Tracker up to 2022. New commitments made in 2021, 2025 and beyond are recorded, tracked and publicly shared through the GNR’s NAF Tracker Platform to monitor all nutrition commitments, including N4G commitments.

This webpage provides an overview of the NAF and introduces key components. Together with other webpages (The Nutrition Action Classification System, The SMARTness of nutrition commitments, Developing the NAF's commitment registration form, A guide to the commitment registration form, FAQs on the NAF’s commitment registration form, a glossary of terms, A guide to NAF commitment progress tracking, the Methodology for assessing NAF commitment progress, and FAQs on commitment progress tracking), this content is ‘live’.

Vision

The ultimate vision of the GNR, and of the NAF, is a world free from malnutrition in all its forms. The framework’s mission is to drive greater action to achieve this. The goal is to inform, shape and inspire action with data and evidence on policy, practice and financing that result in greater accountability and progress in tackling poor diets and malnutrition.

Through the NAF, the GNR developed a common system, language and principles to unify tracking of nutrition action. This will support all stakeholders and decision-makers across sectors in their effort to take meaningful action to tackle poor diets and end malnutrition.

Objectives

Within the GNR’s role as an independent, credible and respected ‘go-to’ global resource, and the primary accountability mechanism for nutrition commitments, the NAF has the following objectives.

1. Record and monitor nutrition commitments made by all stakeholders including governments, donors (such as donor governments and philanthropic organisations), civil society organisations, the private sector, academia and multilateral organisations including UN agencies (Who can make commitments).
2. Establish common principles for monitoring global nutrition accountability and provide evidence-based criteria, processes, technical support and guidance for how nutrition commitments should be formulated, registered and reported.
3. Become the primary public resource for tracking progress against nutrition commitments by presenting standardised accountability indicators and highlighting gaps in and opportunities for nutrition policy and financing.
4. Inspire and empower stakeholders to take strong nutrition action across all sectors, by providing them with high-quality, comprehensive and credible data, information and recommendations, and recognising their efforts.
5. Ensure sustainability of global nutrition accountability monitoring through leveraging existing resources and infrastructure and regular reporting by stakeholders.
6. Continuously assess and update the NAF in order to drive processes and enable faster, efficient, effective and real-world adaptations.

To achieve its objectives, the GNR has developed the NAF. The graphic shared here summarises this global accountability framework, from formulating and registering a nutrition commitment to reporting on progress and taking more action. Embedded within the framework are the elements presented within this section, including methods and approaches, which have been developed to support its operationalisation.

Define and classify nutrition actions

As part of the NAF, we have developed an evidence-based and comprehensive system to define and classify nutrition actions. The aim of the classification system is to help all stakeholders understand the type of ‘nutrition actions’ they can take, and to identify areas that might require attention or prioritisation. The classification system further provides a foundation for efficient tracking and standardised reporting of nutrition commitments.

Establish methods for the qualification of nutrition commitments

To ensure that all nutrition commitments registered through the NAF are well-defined and eligible, we have developed methods and criteria for commitment qualification. The nutrition commitment qualification system takes place at the commitment-making stage. To qualify, a commitment must be SMART and stakeholders must report progress regularly to the GNR. Of note, if a particular commitment is to be announced at a summit (e.g. the N4G Summit or the UN Food Systems Summit), additional requirements may apply. For example, N4G commitments require alignment with the principles of engagement.^[11]

Formulate and register nutrition commitments

To help stakeholders to formulate and register their commitments with the NAF, we have developed a standardised, publicly accessible and interactive platform. For all key pledging moments, this includes embedded guidance and detailed examples of how to formulate SMART commitments. The registration form was available only in English at the start, but over time, it became available in French and Spanish. The plan is for future N4G summit forms to also be translated as resources allow.

Process and verify eligibility of nutrition commitments

Once nutrition commitments are registered to the NAF platform, the GNR reviews these for completeness, clarity of responses and inconsistencies. If necessary, commitment-makers are contacted for clarifications. For all nutrition commitments, the qualifying criteria are whether the commitments are SMART. For nutrition commitments made in the context of the N4G Summit in 2021, an additional specific qualifying criterion was the requirement for manufacturers of breast-milk substitutes to commit to an action plan to achieve full compliance with the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes by 2030, in both policy and practice. The government of Japan facilitated this assessment, in collaboration with the Access to Nutrition Initiative. ^[12]Likewise in 2025, the government of France had similar requirements regarding whether entities themselves were eligible as specified in the in the Paris N4G commitment guide. Again, the Access to Nutrition Initiative collaborated with the host to assess whether entities might be ineligible to commit.

To process N4G commitments, the GNR follows a staged approach. The first stage, pre-summit, consists of limited verification checks (e.g., commitment type, thematic area) to generate a draft list of the commitments to be announced at the summit. The second stage, post-summit, is a full review of the registered commitments to verify SMARTness, with clarification sought from commitment-makers as needed. This determines final eligibility as "verified" commitments. For all other commitments (those made outside N4G summits), we aim to complete verification within a reasonable timeframe, pending resources. In 2022, we provided a synthesis and analysis report on the nutrition commitments made in 2021, the Nutrition Year of Action. The plan for synthesising new commitments or reporting progress on commitments may differ.

Recognise commitment for action

After review and verification, we publish commitments on the NAF Tracker Platform. The platform is a publicly accessible and interactive database of nutrition commitments. Registered commitments are also be searchable against a wide range of criteria such as action area, location and stakeholder group. We highlight notable commitments or country cases to serve as examples or inspiration on the website, or as case studies in press releases and future GNR publications.

Report on progress

The GNR tracks the progress of all registered commitment goals, based on commitment-makers' self-reported data. Following the commitment-making form and guide and initial registration in the NAF GNR then developed and provided a progress assessment survey for commitment-makers to complete digitally and submit for each of their registered commitment goals. Progress assessment is primarily based on tracking the progress of the commitment indicator(s) as laid out at registration. A guide, video, and frequently asked questions on progress reporting for NAF commitment tracking as well the methodology for assessing NAF commitment progress provide more details. The GNR also developed a process for validating the self-reported information and identified well-established and validated accountability indicators against which progress is assessed.

Assess and recognise progress

The GNR developed consistent and standardised criteria for assessing progress, building on existing methods and approaches. We assess the reported progress and make publicly available the progress status of each commitment goal (e.g., ‘no progress made’ or ‘on track’). Achievements and best practices will be shared are NAF Platform.

Tracking and assessing progress can prompt ongoing dialogue and debate about the pace and scale of change. It can also provide a basis for regularly updating the NAF classification and qualification systems. Measuring progress and highlighting notable achievements serve as a continuous learning process that enables stakeholders to identify and revisit, refine and steer towards priority nutrition actions to address changing needs at the national, regional and global levels. This will ultimately lead to more commitments and more action.

Independence

The IEG of the GNR and its co-chairs oversee and are responsible for the design and implementation of the NAF, and the monitoring, tracking and reporting on nutrition commitments. Independence ensures that the NAF can act in line with its objective – to provide standardised, unbiased and unified reporting on nutrition commitments and progress made towards meeting them.

Collaboration

The GNR works with all stakeholders to ensure that the tools developed and outcomes arising from the NAF best serve the needs of the global nutrition community and inspire actions to tackle poor diets and end malnutrition in all its forms.

Excellence

The principle of excellence applies to the performance and outcome of all NAF processes, resources and publications. It applies to the intrinsic scientific quality and rigour of all content produced, including in terms of its adequacy, clarity, completeness and transparency. It also applies to the effective communication of content and conclusions drawn and to the actual and perceived credibility of the NAF. All NAF outputs are based on the best data, evidence and methodology available at the time of their preparation.

Accessibility

The NAF is designed to be publicly accessible and is provided through a user-friendly platform. All resources related to the NAF are available on the GNR website.

Integrity

All actors and processes under the NAF abide by the principle of integrity, which refers to acting with honesty, respect, fairness, objectivity, and in an ethical and responsible manner, and to do no harm.

Transparency

As a framework for monitoring and reporting global action on nutrition, the NAF provides transparency – in a clear and understandable manner – to all developed processes. It also contributes to the sharing of data and best practices. High levels of transparency allow stakeholders and the public to understand how the NAF is built and the extent to which stakeholders are addressing nutrition issues, and to engage with them about their approach and impact. Transparency should also extend to openness, dialogue and engagement with other relevant bodies and third parties.

Inclusivity

The NAF tracks and reports nutrition actions from all groups and institutions interested in contributing to addressing poor diets and malnutrition in all its forms. It aims to be as relevant as possible to the broadest range of stakeholder groups, with different priorities and levels of authority. Through its work to translate as many resources as possible, and to ask commitment-makers to contemplate and report on whether their goals aim to support specific populations, the NAF supports inclusion.

Recognition

The NAF aims to inform and inspire nutrition action among different stakeholder groups and across geographies. It plans to encourage stakeholders to continually improve, thereby demonstrating their increasing contribution to addressing global nutrition challenges. The intention is to highlight ‘success stories’ reflecting best practice, and to provide an equitable opportunity for all stakeholders to be recognised for their actions.

Commitment

To maintain alignment with evolving knowledge and actions, the GNR will continually assess NAF methods and processes. These will be revised and expanded, as needed, while retaining comparability over time. Members and experts involved in the NAF must commit themselves to contributing actively to the work of the framework and are expected to conduct themselves in an exemplary fashion in all activities relating to the NAF.

The NAF is part of the GNR and is therefore governed by the same structures. The GNR is a multi-stakeholder initiative, consisting of a Stakeholder Group, an IEG and host (the current host is PATH).

The Stakeholder Group, headed by co-chairs, consists of high-level members of stakeholder groups. This group provides strategic oversight and direction to the GNR, setting its strategic vision, and is further responsible for the appointment of the chair(s) of the Independent Expert Group and the host organisation. The Stakeholder Group reviews progress against delivery of the GNR and provides advice as required, without interfering with its independence. The group also champions and builds support for the GNR, promoting its findings through its members’ institutions to drive action to tackle poor diets and malnutrition and supporting fundraising.

The IEG, headed by one or two co-chairs, leads the development of the GNR and its content, including data, analysis, synthesis of evidence and conclusions and recommendations, and is accountable for the quality and independence of the GNR. The co-chair(s) appoint(s) group members through an open competitive process to cover areas relevant to the GNR, including the NAF. Members are appointed to the group as individuals independent of their institutions. IEG members are international experts with diverse and synergistic skills who have an advisory role but can take on additional roles. They are collectively accountable for the quality and independence of the GNR.

The GNR host supports the IEG and its co-chairs in developing the GNR, through data analysis, research support, and coordinating and managing functions. It also leads on fundraising and on the production, communication and dissemination of GNR products, as well as maintaining the website and managing its digital assets.

The GNR has been funded by a range of donors, including government agencies, multilateral agencies and philanthropic foundations. Funding agencies have no involvement in the development of GNRs content, including its conception, design, analysis, conclusions, recommendations and messages. They are, however, available to the GNR host for advice on meeting programmatic requirement and further fundraising.

The NAF aims to attract commitments from a wide audience: effectively all stakeholders worldwide with interest and capacity to tackle poor diets and malnutrition in any or all its forms. These stakeholders include:

• Country governments at any administrative level, such as ministry, municipality or any other national/regional/local authority or body that provides financial or non-financial aid to their own country to tackle poor diets and end malnutrition
• Donor governments, meaning any government that provides financial or non-financial aid to other countries to tackle poor diets and end malnutrition
• Donor organisations, including philanthropic organisations
• Private sector food businesses, including in the food systems/production and agri-food industry
• Private sector non-food businesses, such as private healthcare facilities, health insurers and private schools
• Civil society organisations and non-governmental organisations
• Multilateral organisations, including UN agencies and international collaborative initiatives or movements
• Academic and non-academic research institutions.

Over time, as the NAF evolves, it aims to include the following activities.

• Expanding the NAF Platform to allow stakeholders to report annually on progress made towards their commitments.
• Incorporating the progress assessment of the N4G commitments made in 2013 and 2017.
• Actively reaching out to more stakeholders to invite them to register nutrition commitments and join the NAF.
• Expanding the nutrition classification system to include more action areas.
• Engaging with existing nutrition accountability and/or tracking mechanisms, to maximise synergies and minimise duplication of effort.
• Visualising registered nutrition commitments on the platform and serving as a public resource of nutrition actions taken worldwide by countries and other stakeholder groups.

Last updated: 17 October 2025.